Monthly Archives: November 2012

Redefining Literacy: Reflections on my trip to Reggio Emilia

On October 22nd, I traveled to Reggio Emilia with 67 other educators. We had a common focus. We were to visit the schools of this celebrated Italian early childhood program, dialogue with their educational staff and then meet among ourselves to see if we could make significant and enlightening literacy connections between their educational program and current instructional trends in our own schools back homes.

I was driven by a more specific question; one that has been puzzling me for the past few years. How is literacy interpreted in American schools? How is literacy interpreted and supported in the schools in Reggio Emilia? Although this was my third trip to Reggio Emilia, it was the first time that I approached my visit to their schools with such a pointed focus.

For some time now, I’ve been noticing that literacy, in New York City elementary schools, is defined as something that can be framed within a “literacy block” , a specific part of the day when reading, writing and phonics are taught. I wonder if it possible for literacy to encompass a more expansive meaning?

How might an artist define literacy? A scientist? A musician? A mathematician?

When I approached my husband Simon Dinnerstein and asked him how he, as an artist, thinks of literacy, his response was that literacy “would imply the ability to converse about … tone, color value, materials, emotions, expressions, forms, composition, content, …, painting, drawing, …abstraction…and obsession.” For Simon, a high degree of literacy would “consist of backing up ideas with a cogent argument as well as historic and contemporary examples. A super high mode would transform all of these modes into a meaningful personal vision.”

I wrote to the composer, Philip Lasser, and described how a public school’s day includes a “literacy block” and asked him what he thought about this and also how he, as a composer and musician, could describe the concept of being a literate person. He wrote, “Whoever is using the term is really bringing it down to the minimum level of the word, i.e. ability to read. That is being literate but it is not literacy!” When pushed to say more, he responded,” I would think in any discipline, literacy involves a clear overview of the history, periods, seminal figures and an ability to converse about the subject adding a few basic specifics like names, or events, etc….”

For a mathematician’s point of view, I asked Paul Lockhart, author of Measurement and
A Mathematician’s Lament for his take on this question of literacy and he replied, “Of course I agree that literacy in the broader sense is the important idea. And yes, of course, there is definitely such a thing as “math literacy.” I suppose with anything, whether it be writing, poetry, music, science, dance, or mathematics, there are a few levels or varieties of literacy. There’s technical literacy: knowing what fifth position is, or what a perfect fourth is, or how to spell ‘ceiling’, or knowing the Pythagorean theorem. I think this is small potatoes, actually. The REAL meaning of literacy (to me) is understanding the meaning and motivation behind these various arts. What is it that poets do, and why do they do it? What is the history and philosophy of the subject? How has it evolved? Why do humans have such a need to make art and meaning and to communicate it to each other? That sort of thing. To develop a sophistication of taste.”

In the pre-schools and the new elementary school in Reggio Emilia I observed exciting examples of a much more expansive interpretation of literacy. Here is one example of what I mean. A group of four-year-old children had expressed an interest in a flowering Jasmine plant that was in the classroom. After carefully listening to the children’s comments and questions about the plant, the teacher provided opportunities for the children to begin an exploration of perfumes. When they talked to each other, the children seemed to be making references to their mothers and to the perfumes that they used. To follow up on this talk, the teacher set up an appealing display of herbs, spices, fruit peels, and other aromatic artifacts on the art table along with graters, peelers, mortar and pestles, paper, colored pencils, pens, markers, watercolors and other tools. As they explored these materials, the children created symbols for writing perfume recipes, making connections to the smells that came from food being prepared in the school kitchen. They experimented with various ways of extracting smells from plants, discussing the variety of smells that they associate with plants and animals, and creating aesthetically pleasing artistic arrangements of plants and herbs. As this was taking place, the teacher was documenting their animated conversations by drawing her own sketches, taking photographs, and notating bits of dialogue. Periodically, she asked questions and made observations to scaffold their explorations.

In the elementary school, the seven year olds were analyzing words in a way that would put a smile on Diane Snowball’s face. There were snails in the school garden and this sparked an interest in writing about them for some of the children. However, they were having difficulty in figuring out how to spell the Italian word for snail – chiocciola. Rather than proceeding with a spelling lesson or strategy lesson, the teacher provided different types of paper, pencils, crayons and markers. She invited the children to draw a representation of a snail. She then asked them to hypothesize on how the word would be written. The children compared their different spellings of the word and decided that it must be a spelling with many letters. To support their investigations, she gave them strips of paper divided into 10 boxes and asked if they could fit the letters of the word into the boxes.

c     h     i     o     c     c     i     o     l     a

They continued their exploration by looking for words within words that might have a connection to the word chiocciola. They made lists of words that had some connection to the word ‘snail’, all the while discussing the meaning of the word snail and the many ways that the word could be used.

In this simple spelling exploration the children were using drawing, discussions, personal connections to prior experiences and even mathematical thinking to come up with “a meaningful personal vision” for the word chiocciola. They were working together to make meaning of the word and of the spelling of the word. There were boxes provided for analyzing the spelling but the children’s thinking was not slotted into a time-box.

The value that is placed on collaboration, analysis, experimentation, wondering, discourse, and the generally lovely messiness of learning is what so touched my teacher’s heart as I spent time in Reggio Emilia. It bothers me when I visit schools back home and see kindergarten children” days divided into little boxes, like the kindergarten schedule shown below, filled with activities that drain away the natural curiosities that they brought with them when they first arrived in school.

Perhaps my search for a greater interpretation of literacy is misguided. Perhaps what I really want is for our schools, like the schools that I saw in Reggio Emilia, to demonstrate more faith and belief in our children. I would like children to have more opportunities to savor their learning and not to be pushed and rushed up a ladder. I would like children to have the opportunity to deeply explore topics that interest them and to be free to explore these topics as artists, scientists, musicians, athletes …basically using whatever part of the hundred or more languages that speak to them and that they speak in.

I also want teachers to have the same opportunities to grow professionally that are given to the teachers in Reggio Emilia – opportunities for professional collaboration and consultation, time to observe children and, with colleagues, to use these observations and documentation to analyze students work and to plan provocative, engaging and appropriate curriculum that is truly based on what children know, need to know and want to know.

AFTER THE STORM

Night Scene 2 (Simon Dinnerstein)

Today was the first day back in school after Hurricane Sandy for New York City children. The devastation is difficult for adults to process. What, then, are the children thinking? How are they making sense of the way that their world has turned upside down?

This disaster followed, by only two days, an incredible trip to Reggio Emilia, Italy that I took along with 67 other educators. We visited schools, spoke with teachers and parents, attended lectures and spent hours in small groups attempting to process this exciting experience.

It will take me awhile to clarify my reflections on all that I observed. However some words and personal interpretations flash in my mind as though they are lit up in neon: “Belief in children”, “valuing the childish words of children”, “constructivist approach to teaching.” I wonder how the educators in Reggio would deal with this storm that we have just experienced? How did they help their children puzzle out the destruction done by the recent earthquakes in their region?

Yesterday, over lunch, Bill Fulbrecht, kindergarten teacher at P.S. 321 and I spoke about this with regard to the children in his class. I asked Bill if the experience in Reggio would influence how he would broach the topic with his students. “Absolutely,” he replied. He told me that he wanted to start totally with their thoughts. Perhaps it’s not the scientific background that will interest them or the force of the water. Our neighborhood lost many trees during the storm. Huge, old trees were uprooted. Bill thought that this might be what could upset his children the most. How do the trees feel? What is it like to be pulled out of the ground?

He was planning on inviting discussion by asking some broad, open-ended questions. He was going to then follow the lead of the children in pursuing the topic. I’m so curious to speak with him about where this line of inquiry led them.

Earlier today I received the following email from Lucas Rotman, a wonderful kindergarten teacher who’s school is in Battery Park City, an area that was terribly flooded during the storm: “During the hurricane, I was e-mailing back and forth with the families of my kids who live in Battery Park City, an area that was evacuated and knew that the families were dealing with a lot of stress in regards to the storm. I was also listening to NPR quite a bit and they had a number of child psychologists and educators on discussing ways in which parents could talk with their kids about events of this nature and also gave tips about how to use this the time they had together when power goes out (games, story writing, chapter book reading, etc.). I did not see many resources for teachers of young children however in terms of helping kids share their feelings (the sesame street episodes were decent though) and in terms of discussing the science behind hurricanes and storm surges in a way that doesn’t overwhelm and is developmentally appropriate.”

Perhaps the most important resources are the teacher’s ability to listen to the words of the children, observe carefully their drawings, constructions, dramatic play and schoolyard play, and provide opportunities for children to find creative and personal outlets for voicing their thoughts, interpretations, theories and questions.

This is an opportune time for all of us to use this space for sharing suggestions, strategies and questions. I look forward to hearing from you.